top of page


Skills of a Qualified Supervision Leader

​

As a qualified Supervision Leader, I effectively manage group dynamics and processes. This skill comprises eleven (11) related skills that I have grouped into 1) interpersonal dynamics, 2) case processes, and 3) intrapersonal dynamics.


Managing Group Dynamics & Process

​​

  • Facilitating rapport building

  • Developing & adhering to group norms

  • Fostering climate of cooperation

​

 

  • Applying the DC-S framework

  • Applying theory to practice

  • Implementing strategies & techniques based on group dynamics (including the need to struggle)

  • Pausing & Reflecting

​

​​

  • Managing time

  • Managing conflict

  • Using technologies

​

 

Add transition to below!

​

Interpersonal Dynamics

National Interpreter Certification (NIC)

Case Processes

National Interpreter Certification (NIC)

Intrapersonal Dynamics

Managing group dynamics and processes involves my ability to:

​

  • Manage time

​

​

  • Use technologies

​

 

MANAGE CONFLICT

​

Conflict is simply a struggle caused by differences in opinions, values, interests, or needs. Conflict can exist within the case, within the case presenter, between group participants, between the leader and participant(s), between co-leaders, and concerning contexts and narratives of the interpreting field. Conflicts may stem from leaders, presenters, participants, and elements of the cases that have differing personalities, goals, values, expectations, priorities, and training.

​

Supervision leader Audrey Loudenback believes that every case is based on conflict. Since cases are presented for analysis, the supervision process uses reflection-on-action to identify, reflect on, manage, and resolve conflict. This process occurs within a group where differences exist. These differences can positively or negatively affect the group's dynamics, creating cooperation that expands and deepens reflection-on-action or layering on new struggles that hinder some or all of the group, their interactions, and the case analysis. 

 

As a supervision leader,

  • I acknowledge that no case or group is conflict-free.

  • I acknowledge that conflict can be uncomfortable and messy.

  • I believe that conflict can be constructive and leads to growth. 

  • I am (and will continue to develop my) cultural competence, understanding that culture shapes perceptions and responses to conflicts.     

  • I will model a calm and object curiosity by listening to understand.

  • I will assist the group by naming the conflict's struggles and differences.

  • I will guide the discussion toward problem-solving and away from blame.

  • I will recognize when conflict needs intervention or not, acting as required.

  • I will follow up to ensure relationships remain positive and productive.

  • I acknowledge that I am a human who can be triggered and make a mess of things.

  • I commit to being transparent and reactively repairing as needed.

​​​​​

Manage Conflict

The Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Model identifies five styles based on assertiveness and cooperativeness, the degrees to which the needs of self and others are met during conflicts.

​

When I started my journey as an ASL-English interpreter, I had the conflict style of avoiding. I preferred to stay within my comfort zone and maintain harmony.

​​​​​

Thomas-Kilmann Model of five conflict styles: avoiding (low assertiveness & low cooperativeness), accommodating (low assertiveness & high cooperativeness), compromising (moderate assertiveness & moderate cooperativeness), competing (high assertiveness & low cooperativeness), & collaborating (high assertiveness & high cooperativeness).

The Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Model, reproduced from "Thomas Kilmann Conflict Management Model," S. Khandelwal, 2024

​

Now, 20 years into my interpreting journey, I have more communication skills, self-awareness, confidence, and competence. Experience and training have evolved my preferred conflict resolution style to compromising. I like to find common ground in issues, often without simple solutions, by balancing various needs and interests. The compromising conflict style aligns with my constructivist view where there is no "absolute truth" because context matters and knowledge is constructed through personal, lived experiences.

​

bottom of page